Credo Advisors Blog | Results-driven small business and non-profit consulting

Starbucks Challenge and Fair TradeThis past weekend, I had an encounter at an independent coffee shop that has unfortunately sprouted a new batch of questions about Starbucks and their Fair Trade claims. During a short visit to Santa Barbara, my wife and I were holed up at Finestra Cafe for a slew of meetings (it’s our favorite “remote” office when we are in Santa Barbara — free WiFi, excellent coffee [FT+], the best baked goods around, and a great atmosphere), soaking up the java and having a great time.

During one of my return trips to the counter to top off our mugs, I struck up a conversation about Fair Trade Coffee with the cashier. I knew all of their beans were Fair Trade, and mentioned that they should make it more obvious — there aren’t any signs, labels or slight innuendoes that their beans are ethical. I only knew because I had asked during a previous visit, and I was convinced that other patrons might like to know as well.

As all conversations about coffee shops and Fair Trade seem to go lately (at least for me), we ended up steering the conversation toward Starbucks and the Starbucks Challenge. I made some crack about the bag of FT beans they keep stashed in the back of the storeroom, thinking I was being funny, but quickly lost my sense of humor. It turns out that the cashier had previously been an employee of Starbucks and had some insight regarding my sarcastic quaff. He made some lavish claim about how all of Starbucks coffee is actually Fair Trade…and then proceed to mutter about how odd Howard Schultz is as a person. I was a bit taken aback, but resigned myself to thinking that this individual, while pleasant and well-intentioned, probably had no idea what he was talking about.

So I thought…

Yesterday evening, I took my case to a friend who happens to be a manager at Starbucks. Still skeptical about the claims, I nonetheless wanted to hear the truth. Sure enough, all of Starbucks beans are Fair Trade-ish, depending on how loose of a definition you want to use. The main point she stressed is that all of the beans they purchase are procured at price that is essentially a Fair Trade rate for that producer. The kicker is that they are only NOT Fair Trade beans because the producer has not taken the steps to become a certified FT producer. My friend mentioned that the certification process is expensive, and were all of the producers that Starbucks buys from certified, they could actually claim that all of their beans afford the Fair Trade moniker.

Hmm.

So I’ve been chewing on this all night and into the morning and understandably have a few things bouncing around my mind. While I am fairly cautious of large corporations, I also think it is important to know the truth, and then proceed accordingly:

  1. If these claims are true (one former, and one existing Starbucks’ employee) why have we not seen more about this side of the story yet? Is it out there but just not as readily available?
  2. Let’s assume they are true — is the Challenge then about pointing out how poorly trained Starbucks employees are to handle the Fair Trade issue?
  3. And if Starbucks cares enough to spend the extra money on the beans, even though they can’t claim that they are truly Fair Trade, why not pony up the extra cash and help these producers receive their certification? (Perhaps they can use some of the $millions that are left over from Ethos sales past the $10 million mark, eh?)

Here’s a portion from Starbucks’ policy titled “Starbucks, Fair Trade, and Coffee Social Responsibility[PDF] to consider:

“Starbucks is committed to paying fair prices for all of our coffee. We do that to ensure that farmers make a profit and to encourage future production of high quality coffee. Starbucks pays premium prices that are substantially over and above the prevailing commodity-grade coffee prices. In fiscal 2003, when prices for commercial-grade arabica coffee ranged from $0.55-$0.70 per pound, Starbucks paid an average of $1.20 per pound for all of our coffee.

“Fair Trade Certified coffee is one part of a larger effort by Starbucks to be socially responsible in our relationships with coffee farmers and communities Fair Trade certification is limited to small-scale farmers organized in cooperatives, and currently represents less than 3% of the world’s coffee farmers. Because of our size and quality requirements, Starbucks buys coffee from small, medium, and large scale farms. We pay premium prices for all coffee. We use coffee purchasing guidelines, called C.A.F.E. Practices, which give preference to farmers who score high in measurements of economic fairness, socially responsible working conditions, and progressive environmental practices.

“Starbucks provides financing that helps coffee farmers invest in their farms and hold their beans for sale at times of favorable market prices. This year alone, Starbucks provided $1 million for financing through the Calvert Foundation, giving 10,000 Fair Trade coffee farmers access to affordable credit. In addition, Starbucks provided another $2.5 million to Conservation International’s Verde Ventures, making similar financing available to additional farmers in Central and South America.”

Okay. Now check out Starbucks: Fairly Deceptive Claims.

This is a complicated scenario and it is difficult to know what the real truth is without doing some detailed hands-on research. Nonetheless, it is very important to talk about and explore as the implications, one way or another, are pretty substantial.

icon_credo TAGS: | | | | | |

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • StumbleUpon
  • Print

Kauffman eVenturing

November 18th, 2005 | Posted by Peter in Business Strategy | Corporate Social Responsibility | Miscellaneous - (Comments Off)

The Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation recently opened a new site called eVenturing. The site looks like it is packed to the brim with information and will most certainly be a resource I use regularly:

“Geared to those who are building companies that innovate and create jobs and wealth, Kauffman eVenturing is the trusted guide for entrepreneurs on the path to high growth. The site provides original articles, written by entrepreneurs for entrepreneurs, and aggregates “the best of the best” content on the Web related to starting and running high-impact companies.

“Entrepreneurs will find eVenturing to be an interactive, vibrant, and vital place to make important connections, access help and advice, and find relevant, practical “just-in-time” information and tools.”

Thanks to The Entreprenurial Mind for their post which introduced me to the site.

icon_credo TAGS: | | | |

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • StumbleUpon
  • Print

“Global Reach” Follow-Up

November 18th, 2005 | Posted by Peter in Business Strategy | China | Corporate Social Responsibility - (Comments Off)

I was reading Thom Singer’s blog and found a comment that nicely reflects the dynamic I was trying to point out in my last post. Here’s a small portion of Singer’s post (the rest can be found here):

“The men and women in line appear to come from every ethnic and economic background, yet they are all bonded together by the fact that they are spending on coffee an amount of money that could feed a family for days in a third world country.”

Gee, I wonder what coffee shop he is talking about…

icon_credo TAGS: | | | |

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • StumbleUpon
  • Print

Google Analytics was released a few days ago and is definitely a great tool to integrate into your sites if you are interested in looking at and analyzing traffic data. (And who wouldn’t want to pour over traffic data, right?)

One interesting piece of information, which is parsed into a nice graphic, is the geographic location of your visitors. I feel it is particularly informative and found myself fantasizing about visiting some of the dots that appeared outside of the US. Here’s yesterday’s map:

Geo Map of visitors to credoadvisors.com/blog

While looking at this kind of information may be fun, it is a sobering reminder of the true global nature of the internet. What we say is no longer only heard by those in earshot. On the internet (especially in the blog realm), we can say something off the cuff in Sleepytown, USA, and it could pop up on someone’s radar in Australia within the hour. Sure, that may seem cool, but with such reach comes a much larger responsibility…

To an extent I am referring to being aware of language and interpretation differences, but more so, I want to stress the importance of having a more global view regarding the issues you choose to explore. Businesses and individuals who want their voices to be heard as far and wide as possible have a responsibility, in my opinion, to consider the issues and needs of all the ears they seek. Yet, even if you believe firmly in such a principle, how do you go about practically honoring it? Is it simply a matter of having compassion and reading the international press every day, or is anything short of a full cultural immersion simply fluff?

icon_credo TAGS: | | | |

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • StumbleUpon
  • Print

Wal*MartWal*Mart seems to have successfully trumped any negative PR it may have been subject to and managed to actually increase its profits by 4% (see Campaign Against Wal-Mart Hasn’t Touched Profits). How is that possible given the impact of the recent hurricanes as well as the various public critiques of the company (including the full-page ad in the New York Times referenced in the linked article)? Well, as noted in the article, Wal*Mart has done a fantastic job of keeping labor costs in check:

“Wal-Mart said on Monday that its profit increased 4 percent, which is in line with what analysts were expecting.

“‘Even with the lingering impacts of the hurricanes and the impact of higher energy prices, I believe we will have a good holiday season,’ Chief Executive Lee Scott told analysts.

“Wire reports said analysts were pleased that Wal-Mart managed to contain labor costs, and therein lies a controversy.”

icon_credo TAGS: | | | |

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • StumbleUpon
  • Print

There’s an interesting short article in the current issue of CFO about Ben and Jerry’s former CFO, Stuart Wiles, scamming some money from the company (Et Tu, Ben and Jerry’s). The article points out the irony of the situation, as the company is widely known for it’s social agenda, and “commitment to create ‘economic opportunities for those who have been denied them.’”

The details of the skim job are surprising in their brazenness:

“From 2000 to 2004, Wiles charged personal expenses to his company credit card and issued company checks for nonexistent obligations, using the funds to pay his own bills. Wiles, who also allegedly scammed the company into paying $58,000 for an addition to his home, agreed to plead guilty to wire fraud.”

There are several things that I find particularly disturbing…

First, what was someone like Wiles doing at a company like Ben and Jerry’s? Something must have gone wrong in the interview process to have allowed him entry into the company. You would think that someone possessing the ability to steal money from a cute cartoon cow who peddles Chunky Monkey would probably have a bit of a culture clash with the rest of the folks there. I wonder if the interview was uncomfortable but Wiles seemed to be the man for the job anyway. Either way, I have a feeling that there was probably some friction between he and the rest of the company (or at least I hope so) that might indicate that they made a poor hiring decision. Because if not, I think I’m going to be pretty paranoid about the hiring process from now on.

Or, perhaps, the feel-good social responsibility angle the company purports is little more than hype. What if it’s just a bunch of fluff and marketing hyperbole and they are actively seeking executives with a certain disregard for ethics. I doubt that is the case, but I’m still left scratching my head as to how a company with such an obvious and strong social and ethical mission would manage to bring on someone like Wiles. Perhaps this is a result of Unilever entering the picture (in 2000). It is feasible that the internal company culture changed significantly, despite the fact that Ben and Jerry’s still operates on its own. If so, what does that say about the efficacy of mergers? They already have a pretty poor reputation in terms of return to investors, but throw in a bit of extra fraud and brand dilution and one has to wonder if they are worth it at all.

Sheesh. I think I’ll go have some Phish Food and try and forget about this whole thing.

icon_credo TAGS: | | | |

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • StumbleUpon
  • Print

My wife posted some new photos of our son on our photography blog, and rather than double up, I figured I’d point everyone over there.

He’s actually five weeks old tomorrow…time certainly flies (most of the photos were taken two weeks ago). I am continually amazed at how he is developing—the miracle of the human body is so utterly fascinating and complex. I’ve also noticed the differences in natural parenting instincts that exist between my wife and I. She coddles and coos, while I massage and rile him up.

I’ve also been giving him an opportunity to work his legs a bit. He stands naturally if you hold him up, though for only a second or two. I’ve noticed, though, that if you make the position comfortable for him, he is capable of standing for quite a while on his own power (I have to steady him, of course), say 5-10 seconds at a time. It’s pretty neat watching him try as it seems like he naturally wants to go through the motions, yet his motor skills aren’t quite there yet! He’s been attempting to crawl for about a week and a half now, mainly when I lay him stomach-down on my chest. I usually put my hands under his feet so he can push off, and a few grunts later, he’s up near my ear. The best part is that he seems completely unaware of using his arms in the process. They kind of flail about on the side. Oh well. As long as he’s enjoying himself, right?

icon_credo TAGS: | | |

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • StumbleUpon
  • Print

[no. 4] Joy & Happiness!

August 21st, 2005 | Posted by Peter in Corporate Social Responsibility | On Being A Father... - (Comments Off)

Caleb and II’d be lying if I were to say that these first two weeks (13 days, to be exact) have been without stress and frustration. Caleb had begun to sleep for longer stretches during the night (one night he had several 3 1/2 hour stints) but quickly moved to much shorter durations filled with lots of grunting and periodic cries. All due to gas. Ahhhh gas. It’s amazing that the foods that my wife cherishes the most are at the top of the list of gas-producing substances that she must avoid in order to prevent discomfort for Caleb. Ironically, the foods are on the “healthy” list: Broccoli, tomatoes, peppers, garlic, etc. Somehow cheese, cookies (sans chocolate) and bread are better for the wee baby…

Which brings me to Joy. Last night was a mix of 15-60 minute stints of restless sleep for my wife and I as our son was really battling the air bubbles in his system. As an isolated incident, such a sleepless night might not usually raise our frustration levels. However, night 13 of sleepless nights has such a capacity. So where’s the joy? At some point last night, as I was massaging our son’s tummy and legs, accompanied by his extremely cute and humorous grunts, my wife commented to me that she hadn’t ever seen me so happy. Quite a comment at 3am, no? And then it hit me: I am extremely happy and joyful… My son is the greatest gift I have ever received and brings an unimaginable amount of joy and happiness into my life. More than enough, it seems, to elicit laughter and humor at 3am, night after night.

I giggle and laugh when he grunts, when we have to change his diaper for the third time in 5 minutes (we thought we had the process perfected—he’s a sneaky one, he is), when he stretches and sighs, when he’s sleeping, when he wakes up, when he sneezes, when he coughs… pretty much anytime I’m around him.

And why would I want anything else?

And now I have to relate this revelation to business… If I had a choice between spending my time doing something that brought me joy and happiness, or slaving away at some cush job that had security, great pay, but brought me little to no happiness, why wouldn’t I choose the former? What if it meant giving up a great salary and benefits package? Prestige? I’d still unfulfilling job.

I’m sure I’ll be blasted with 1000′s of comments about how you can’t always choose the path of greater happiness as it simply isn’t practical. I would have to strongly disagree. I’d say it’s pretty impractical to force yourself to stay in a situation that you don’t enjoy, that doesn’t make you feel good, and that doesn’t bring you any joy or happiness. I’m certainly not saying that everyone should quit their jobs and become forest rangers and artists. Nor am I saying that even if everyone pursued Joy with fierce determination that they’ll eventually find it. But I am saying that they should try…

Challenge yourself to pursue joy and happiness and you just might find it. Sure, the road may be difficult and filled with a lot of sleepless nights and stinky diapers, but I guarantee you’ll be much happier.

icon_credo TAGS: | | | | |

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • StumbleUpon
  • Print